Planning battle over historic building’s new windows

The Lace House Now (2019)The Lace House Now (2019)
The Lace House Now (2019)
New windows in a historic Brighton city centre building may be removed as they do not follow a traditional pattern, despite widespread support.

Changes to windows at the Lace House, in Old Steine, mean that the owners of the grade II* listed building, known for the small cat sculpture on the side, have had to apply for retrospective planning permission.

It was derelict and converted from offices into flats in 2017. Between the 1930s and 1970s it was used as a car showroom.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

However, in a report going before Brighton and Hove City Council’s Planning Committee on Wednesday, the new windows are described as “at odds with the formality and symmetry of the building” by the council’s heritage department.

Lace House June 2016Lace House June 2016
Lace House June 2016

Supporters have sent the council 13 letters praising the new windows. Owners Lace Wilson Properties also has the backing of Regency ward councillor Tom Druitt.

The Green councillor asked the Planning Committee to review the application and said: “I understand that the managing agent is being asked to remove the new, safer, windows in favour of less safe windows and if this is true have to question the logic of this.”

Letters of support from the public describe the award-winning building as transforming the area.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

A supporting comment, with details redacted on the council’s website, said: “Lace House has been transformed from a rundown eyesore to a stylish development – entirely in keeping with its prominent position – and the feel of modern, stylish Brighton – building on its architectural heritage.

“The overall look of the building is a fresh, modern take on a classic design and the windows are a large part of that contemporary classic feel.

“The redevelopment of the building has really enhanced and helped transform this very central location – and the windows play a big part of that.”

Another supporting commenter, whose details were redacted on the council’s website, said that the building had been an eyesore.

Hide Ad